errorPlease register the sub image.

Selected Cases

General Civil Litigation,Intellectual Property Rights,Unfair Competition Prevention & Trade Secrets

Complete Victory Following Dismissal of Preliminary Injunction Claims Alleging Product Imitation Under the Unfair Competition Prevention Act

  • Date 2026.08.04
  • Hit 106


1. Case Overview
The applicant was a company engaged in the import, export, and sale of consumer goods and had been manufacturing and selling a particular product.
The respondent was likewise manufacturing and selling products made from the same material.

Claiming that the respondent's products were imitations of its own products, the applicant filed a preliminary injunction seeking relief for alleged violations of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act.

2. Key Issues
The principal issue in this case was whether the respondent's products constituted a violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act.

3. Legal Strategy
Attorneys Young-ho Chae and Hyun-june Kim of One Law Partners, LLC argued that similarities between the parties' products, including their shape, perforations, and overall configuration, fell within categories commonly adopted in the industry or were attributable to functional and practical considerations.

In addition, the attorneys presented objective evidence demonstrating that the respondent had independently developed its products through its own efforts and design process.

4. Significance of the Decision
The court accepted the arguments presented by One Law Partners, LLC and dismissed the applicant's request for a preliminary injunction.

The court held that the similarities between the products arose from forms and functional elements commonly used within the relevant industry and therefore did not constitute an act of unfair competition.

This case confirms that the mere existence of visual similarities between products is insufficient, by itself, to establish a violation of the Unfair Competition Prevention and Trade Secret Protection Act.

The decision is particularly significant because it protects legitimate product development and fair competition by taking into account functional characteristics, industry practices, and the independent nature of the development process when assessing alleged product imitation.

-
Attorney Young-ho Chae | yhchae@onelawpartners.com
Attorney Hyun-june Kim | hjkim2@onelawpartners.com
-
Public Relations Team, One Law Partners, LLC | pr@onelawpartners.com


SNS Share 페이스북 공유하기트위터 공유하기네이버 공유하기